this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
778 points (90.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26910 readers
2515 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sniatch@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Don't you think it sounds crazy to build a underground storage just to have it closed for a million years. I just can't understand why anybody would want that.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Compared to Fossil fuels that'll stay in the air for thousands of years while they essentially terraform the planet into something way less habitable for humans? How the hell is that more logical???

Finland is a bit too north and cold for rapid deployment and storage of renewables. Although summer is excellent for solar, winter makes solar barely useful and can decrease some wind (newer designs help a lot with the snow issue).

Germany is more stable, but electrical storage is still an issue, along with the larger population. Having planned at least 1 new power plant while decommissioning the older ones would have made a lot more sense while transitioning to 100% renewables. Spent nuclear fuel doesn't use much space - the spent fuel can be stored underground in containers in deep bed rock in drilled shafts and then cemented over. It's less effort and resources that what Germany's many mining companies use extracting minerals or fossil fuels.

Can't do the same for all that pollution your damn lignite plants make though.

[–] Sniatch@lemmy.world -3 points 6 months ago

No, investing in nuclear costs sooo much money. Money that would be missed for building reneweables. If the conservatives wouldnt have blocked the renewable boom we had in 2012, we would be much further. Im glad were out of that nuclear stuff.

[–] pendingdeletion@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Not really no, it sounds logical and fairly simple.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Isn't water an issue under ground

[–] Forester@yiffit.net -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

not that deep, also Fossil fuels are currently devastating our water and air. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horizontal_drillhole_disposal

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Its neat that the hole phases through the ground water aquifer without ever touching it.

[–] Forester@yiffit.net -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

FFS do some research, you dig a big hold drill sideways for a bit and back fill it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horizontal_drillhole_disposal

[–] Sniatch@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But why would you do that if you can just without.

[–] Forester@yiffit.net -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well you see we kinda are failing at the whole mitigating climate change issue and we and we only have so many rare earth minerals to exploit for large scale battery storage banks. And every year we are burning more Fossil Fuels and shutting down more reactors and building no new modern designs and giving nuclear none of the funding the fossil fuel industry receives or the renewables industry receives.

[–] Sniatch@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Because funding nuclear is just a hole with no bottom and it takes too much time. Money should be spent on other things.

[–] Forester@yiffit.net -3 points 6 months ago

Brother its a mine-shaft or borehole not a resort and casino

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horizontal_drillhole_disposal