Linux

48220 readers

643 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

What features would I be losing if I switched to GNOME? (lemmy.world)

submitted 6 months ago by tester1121@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I don't mean for this to become a KDE vs GNOME post. I'm looking at switching to Fedora (because Arch is a pain), and it seems that GNOME is more supported. I use KDE on Arch. What features would I be losing if I were to switch? (ex: toolbar management, KRunner, etc.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 35 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

No, KDE is just as well supported on Fedora, dont worry. I use it daily.

I also highly recommend using Fedora Kinoite from https://ublue.it

It is way more reliable, you cannot imagine how much. It is the best distribution model in my experience, you never have to worry about updates breaking anything, and you can always go back to vanilla.

[–] jonwyattphillips@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

https://getaurora.dev/

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

If you like and trust Homebrew for packages, yes.

I have to try it, am kinda suspicious but I guess it is a good distribution method?

[–] jonwyattphillips@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I had never used homebrew before switching to bluefin. Honestly I still hardly use it. Most gui things I can find flatpaks and command line stuff I'll search homebrew, but just as easy to open Ubuntu distrobox and apt install or install a .deb

I love that everything is updating constantly. That you can roll back easily if you mess something bad. That all system files are immutable so. Also super easy to rebase from to bluefin to ublue to Aurora to Bazzite to kinoite.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 months ago

I dont get why they push Ubuntu so much. I use a Fedora toolbox which works great... apart from the fact that there is no damn upgrade! So only rawhide possible, lol.

Rebasing and rpm-ostree are truly beautiful. And adapting to it, for example packaging stuff written to /usr into an RPM, is interesting.

I have at least 2 use cases (placing different SDDM launch scripts, SDDM themes and something else) that need to be written to the immutable directory.

I think documenting how to package "put script abc to /usr/foo/bar" into an RPM, or even automate it, will be lit. Will try to figure that out when I have time.

Lunarequest did this with sddm2rpm but only for that job.

load more comments (2 replies)