this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
14 points (75.0% liked)

Solarpunk technology

2371 readers
9 users here now

Technology for a Solar-Punk future.

Airships and hydroponic farms...

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A wild Anker enters the home battery market.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 2 points 6 months ago (5 children)

I think the idea of battery storage is solar punk in and of itself, just because it's had some nice branding doesn't take away from the fact that in a post capitalist future, everyone would have a battery attached to their house.

[–] theluddite@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Just because a postcapitalist world should have a battery for every house does not make batteries in and of themselves solarpunk. The story surrounding the battery, in this case, the branding, is actually precisely what matters, because solarpunk is explicitly about speculative futures. It's a genre of science fiction that creates an optimistic and green aesthetic to aid in imagining a postcapitalist world. Posting a link to a currently existing consumer grade technology with consumerist branding is, by definition, not solarpunk.

"A good science fiction story should be able to predict not the automobile but the traffic jam." You're posting the automobile. Science fiction is about the social context of the technology as much if not more than about the technology itself.

Again, I'm not saying that personal batteries are bad, or have no part in a postcapitalist future.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"Technology for a solar punk future". By your own admission, you're not disputing that batteries have a place in a solar punk future, so no harm, no foul. If you're interested in a conversation about the pros and cons of exploiting capitalism to get to that future, that's a different conversation for a different post completely.

[–] theluddite@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

I think that's a very weird interpretation of that, but fair enough :)

load more comments (2 replies)