this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
758 points (89.9% liked)

memes

10335 readers
1548 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 234 points 7 months ago (36 children)

Someone needs to learn about cumulative effects.

[–] Phlogiston@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Is it cumulative? Or is it probability — which of course goes up if you shower yourself in radiation multiple times a day?

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Radiation is not a matter of chance, but a matter of how much.

[–] metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub 8 points 7 months ago

Every day, your body will probably generate at least one cell that would be cancerous if it wasn't for your immune system. If that probability goes up slightly as a result of mildly increased radiation that day, it likely won't overload the immune system's capacity to deal with it. If it is overexposed to radiation, eventually the greater probability of cancerous mutations exceeds the immune system's capacity.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago

It's probabilistic when it's 1 particle at a time.

At these rates of exposure from radiation it becomes primarily cumulative because at some point it's not a question of if you'll damage some cells or not, it's a question of if you're damaging them faster than they can repair or not.

There's still a probabilistic factor in when it leads to medically relevant damage and of what type, but it follows a pretty predictable scale dependent on prior dose

load more comments (31 replies)