this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
169 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59288 readers
4220 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eggyhead@kbin.social 28 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

Even as an avid Apple user, it just comes off as either sheer incompetence or disingenuousness to hear Apple wax such poetic over compromised security from alternative store fronts when macOS is just sitting there, having been doing it fine for generations.

I’m almost expecting Apple to deliberately self-sabotage iOS in the EU somehow just to make a point.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

I’m almost expecting Apple to deliberately self-sabotage iOS in the EU somehow just to make a point.

Please PLEASE let them do that, hopefully they will lose market share, and it will spread to other regions too, how awful iPhones really are.
Maybe we can even get some more serious regulation to reign in the giant tech companies.

[–] Eggyhead@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Eh, I still think iPhones are pretty great and serve a purpose, but I do think apple has built their ivory tower way too high. I’m all for reining them in a bit.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Yes they are great in much the same way Foie Gras is.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foie_gras

load more comments (1 replies)