Eugene

360 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to /c/Eugene@lemmy.world! This is the community for the city of Eugene, Oregon and all of Lane county.

If you're visiting or moving to Eugene and have questions, make sure you use the search first, to see if your question already has an answer.

Rules:

1. Relevance
All submissions should be relevant to Eugene/Springfield/Oregon.

2. No Harassment
Includes Name-calling, doxxing, or explicit use of racist, misogynist/misandrist, or homophobic language.

3. No Violence
Do not post content that encourages, glorifies, incites, or calls for violence or physical harm against an individual or a group of people.

4. No Trolling
Troll accounts will be banned.

5. Temporary pandemic catch-all
Anti-mask, anti-vaccine, COVID-19 denialism, spreading misinformation, attempts to downplay the severity, danger and/or risk of COVID-19 and standing up for those who do so will earn you a ban. Encouraging complacency, neglect, unhealthy habits and unwellness in the community is not allowed. Attempting to get around these rules will get you banned.

Local Event Listings:

Other Oregon Communities:

Local News Outlets:

Useful Eugene Links

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

ewe@lemmy.world

EugeneModeratorBot@lemmy.world

Rep Paul Holvey (Eugene's rep in OR house legislature) just voted to reverse M110 (lemmy.world)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by letsmakeafriendship@lemmy.world to c/eugene@lemmy.world

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The legislature has no business reversing a citizen ballot initiative. The entire point of ballot initiatives is to enable citizens to go over the heads of the legislature, it is a check on their power. We are very fortunate in Oregon to have that right, many states do not. But that check on their power is useless if they can just reverse whatever gets voted on.

Remember that ranked choice voting is coming up as a ballot initiative as well, which is something both parties have great incentive to reverse. If there's one thing Democrats and Republicans can agree on, it's that they don't want competition from any other parties.

If public opinion shifted so hard against M110, they should have sent a revised version of M110 or a reversal back to ballot.

I look forward to voting against you in the primary Holvey.

Source: https://olis.oregonlegislature.gov/liz/2024R1/Measures/Overview/HB4002

PS If you have any thoughts on this or any other issue, you can contact Holvey here https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/holvey

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] EndOfLine@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

HB4002

WHAT THE MEASURE DOES:

The measure removes barriers and establishes programs and policies aimed at improving access to substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. It also establishes a criminal justice framework for possession or delivery of controlled substances designed to encourage treatment over penalties such as jail or probation.

That sounds pretty inline with my understanding M110. Am I missing something?

[–] letsmakeafriendship@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

ACLU has a decent overview of it. The tldr is that it's re-criminalizing posession. https://www.aclu-or.org/en/take-action-now-tell-lawmakers-we-need-real-solutions-not-more-jails

[–] EndOfLine@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Thank you. That was a very insightful read.