this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
214 points (98.6% liked)

Australia

3607 readers
56 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Infuriating. In this form, private education is an absolute cancer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nath@aussie.zone 14 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Private schools also receive the bulk of their revenue from private contributions and fees.


(Plus another $8k one-off fee to apply/enrol a child)

The article is glossing over the fact that the crazy amount of money this school has is coming from parents.

$32,000 to $47,000 per year per kid pays for a lot. Assuming these fees were frozen for the next 13 years (which they obviously won't be), it'd cost a parent $525,284 per kid to send them to this school. Plus all the other costs like uniforms, books, excursions etc.

Some people can afford this.

[–] rainynight65@feddit.de 8 points 8 months ago (4 children)

That's the other thing about these schools - the school fees themselves basically just buy you the privilege to send your kid there. But then you still get ripped thousands more for pretty much everything else. And it's not like their uniforms will be cheap. You pay extra for any sporting activity, you pay extra for electronic devices, it's just a money grab from beginning to end.

And at the end of the day, the only thing you can say with certainty is that your education was expensive. But was it worth it? Was it better than a public school?

[–] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Was it better than a public school?

Well, if you want to go by HSC results (and many people would consider that the yardstick) then there's many private schools among the top schools, although there's also lots of government selective schools, including the very top 4.

See: https://bettereducation.com.au/results/hsc.aspx

The highest-ranked private schools are probably academically selective in some way too, though, so I wouldn't think we can attribute the results to just the teaching there. And even if they don't, kids of wealthy parents have an academic advantage throughout their education because of factors tied to their parents' wealth (aside from being able to afford private education).

I'd imagine, though, at least some of the vast amounts of cash these schools have must go towards attractive wages for good teachers and more of them (smaller class sizes), and both of those things make a difference.

[–] notgold@aussie.zone 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

so there are government selective schools that get higher funding than regular public schools. That seems fair /s

[–] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 1 points 8 months ago

I actually have no idea if government selective schools get more funding.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)