this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
431 points (98.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7174 readers
162 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rusticus@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Carbon tax. We needed it 20 years ago but even more now. Ironically a Republican idea that has been ignored for years.

[–] mintyfrog@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Right. There's no reason why private jets shouldn't be paying to offset 100% of their emissions. For cars it's a different story because it's a tax on the poor for something they need. Private jets are purely luxuries, only used by the wealthy, and have a viable alternative.

[–] Eggyhead@artemis.camp 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe a dumb question, but how does providing money actually offset emissions? Are there emission vacuums somewhere that require payment to operate?

[–] threegnomes@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

not real ones, most of them are scams where countries accept money in order to not deforest areas they werent going to anyway, double dip, or just deforest regardless

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)