this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
130 points (100.0% liked)
Superbowl
3288 readers
336 users here now
For owls that are superb.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
There's a few eagle owls!
Eurasian (the most popular)
Indian
Pharaoh (I like this one too)
Cape
Arabian
Greyish
Spotted
Verreaux (the fugly one from last week's post)
Spot Bellied
Barred
Fraser's
Akun
Philippine
Dusky
Shelley's
Whaaaaaaaaat!! So many!
I knew the Eurasian one because it gets mentioned on the lists of largest owls in the world. I thought it was the one and only.
I honestly forgot the Verreaux was also an Eagle Owl. Just remembered Verreaux, which is such a wizard name haha.
I just looked up the Pharaoh, and I would never in my life have guessed a difference between that owl and the GHO. (Except, obviously, the desert pictures lol). Even it's face markings are so similar to GHO!
Which makes me wonder why the GHO didn't get named as an Eagle Owl of some sort? Quirk of history, I suppose.
I've got some more mind blowing info for you!
GHO and Eurasian Eagle Owl are very closely related, with their closest mutual relative being... The Snowy Owl!
The Snowies and the Great Horned and Lesser Horned Owls all came to be as waves of migration over the Bering Land Bridge.
So the GHO and Snowy are both species of genus Bubo, along with all those Eagle Owls!
The naming difference was probably they just didn't know they were related at the time. Since the GHO is North America only, they wouldn't have known the populations were once the same. (Just guessing here)
As of 2020, many have also put the fish owls in the same clade as the Bubo owls, making them cousins.
What a wild family history!
It's so interesting to watch the retrospective reclassification of biology as we learn more and more. To compare what people thought they knew a hundred years ago with what we know now.
Yes, exactly!
Science isn't about finding "answers" so much as just a progressively deeper understanding. I get people getting frustrated when "science changes," but it should be seen as a feature, not a bug.
In another hundred years, people will think that we were ignorant about many things, but it isn't our fault. We're improving and building on our previous collective knowledge, and those in the future will just be building on what we learn the hard way too.