this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
296 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19148 readers
1986 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Less than three months into Mike Johnson’s tenure as speaker of the House, some House Republicans are already experiencing buyer’s remorse.

Texas Representative and Freedom Caucus member Chip Roy on Monday publicly raised the possibility of dumping Johnson as speaker.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 69 points 10 months ago (3 children)

This is nothing to cheer for. He worked out some semblance of a deal with Biden, whereas they want someone who will refuse any cooperation whatsoever and burn the government to the ground in hopes of getting a Republican president elected.

Hopefully instead they vacate themselves this election so the rest of the county doesn't need to be part of their internal clown show.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 117 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I will cheer for the expulsion of a Christian nationalist of this caliber. There is so much wrong with this guy.

[–] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world 43 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You did see what happened after the kicked Kevin out though right? We all thought Kevin was a horrible pro-maga sleezeball, and yet they found someone worse.

I really don't want to underestimate their ability to do it again.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nah, it's better to have them wasting their time on kicking out their own speaker. That takes time away that they could be using to get organized. Either outcome (he stays or goes) means that Republican voters and representatives are creating enemies in their own party. That's good for Democrats.

[–] matjoeman@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Unless the government shuts down because they can't pass a budget and voters blame Biden.

[–] Aidinthel@reddthat.com 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Historically, voters have always blamed the ones making extra demands for shutdowns.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

Exactly. Republicans will always blame Democrats but voters in the middle (uninformed) will just blame the side going nuts over it.

Look at what Hunter Biden did today. House Republicans were trying to hold him in contempt for not testifying (in private). He showed up at the hearing and offered to testify publicly. Republicans looked like fools. They went nuts.

[–] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 6 points 10 months ago

Those people aren’t paying attention to what’s going on anyway. It’s at a point where people are either informed/informing themselves or their heads are stuck in the sand believing whatever their chosen side/representatives feed them.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

That's a fair take, but also maybe we would be lucky enough to have more of them resign/retire due to their frustrations, if there was a silver lining pathway out of it.

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean, at a certain point legacy conservatives are going to have to realize they need to throw in with the Democrats and🖕MAGA even if it costs them a primary if they care at all about the survival of the United States.

[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Or resign and give the majority to the Democrats...

[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Just like McCarthy's ouster was nothing to cheer for. Sure, he was a horrible person in many ways but less horrible than his replacement. Even though I understood why the Democrats were tempted to go along with it due to the sheer stupidity of the Republicans, at least McCarthy understood there needed to be compromise to get anything done. Dems shouldn't have participated in his ouster, and shouldn't probably in Johnson's case either. His replacement will likely be worse.

Be careful what you wish for.

[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

McCarthy was no friend to Democrats . He made deals and reniged on the terms. He also openly bashed Democrats after getting cooperation on major votes.

Fuck that guy, Republicans won’t change unless you let them put their own people in place and watch them fail.

[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Do you think Johnson was an improvement? Do you think his replacement will be?

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago

Let them keep showing their ass to the public, make it clear to the "centrists" who they are.

[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, but Democrats have no business looking out for Republican interests. They should go for the jugular every time.

[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But we the public may pay the price. A prolonged government shutdown won't resolve itself positively. Having an angry, unreasonable Rep in charge could be a disaster for the country, and there's no telling who'll cave in first in such a horrible game of chicken. I'd bet the Dems and if so, it won't be good for the country.

[–] not_again@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

"Some of you may die, but that's a risk I'm willing to take"