this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
1083 points (97.4% liked)

linuxmemes

21222 readers
37 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     

    2024 is the Year of Linux on the Desktop, at least for my boyfriend. He's running Windows 7 right now, so I'll be switching him to Ubuntu in a few days. Ubuntu was chosen because Proton is officially supported in Ubuntu.

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 30 points 11 months ago (21 children)

    Why not Linux mint? It is way more use friendly.

    Also why on earth is anyone using windows 7 in 2023. I stopped using it to move to Linux back in 2016

    [–] DerMann@feddit.de 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Anyone who down voted pls explain...

    [–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    Perhaps because this is such a typical Linux-bro meme?

    By no means is it more user friendly. I drive it daily, my grandmother most definitely could not, they're way too many times when something stops working or goes wrong with DEs.

    [–] hangonasecond@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

    I think they mean more user friendly than plain Ubuntu.

    [–] lud@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    I also find those constant Linux comments annoying but one should really avoid using Windows 7. Win 7 has been out of support for a long time, either update to Win 10 (if possible), air gap it, install some other OS like Linux, or consider replacing the computer.

    [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    It depends on what you mean. For me, it's pretty user friendly, but I'm also fairly comfortable using a terminal and am very technologically literate. The fact it handles tedious tasks automatically (or can be made to trivially) is so much nicer than Windows. You can easily update all applications and your system in a matter of seconds. Compared to Windows where the application itself has to check for updates when it launches, sends you to download the installer, you have to run that and close the previous version, relaunch, and then you're finally updated for that single application. Let's not talk about system updates. Linux is more friendly. It requires a certain level of competence that Windows doesn't, but if you're above that level it's generally better.

    Sure, things can go wrong with DEs and other stuff, but it's often easier than when things go wrong in Windows. Have you ever had the desktop or Explorer crash in Windows? It's a bad time. Windows is not user friendly. People are just used to it.

    [–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Why do so many Linux users not understand the meaning of user-friendly?

    [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    Because anyone who has used Linux thinks user friendly means things just work and settings are in the same place as last time

    Linux users tend to be more GUI-oriented than Windows users as well

    [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    They both do things that are more user-friendly than the other. The fact you think it isn't user-friendly is really showing who doesn't understand the term. I listed a few things Linux handles better than Windows, and there are many more. Windows fails at many steps, but people accept they understand Windows and deal with it. Windows also doesn't have any options for customization, so it's the same bad for everyone, which does help people solve issues, though they maybe shouldn't have had them in the first place.

    [–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

    Linux is more friendly. It requires a certain level of competence that Windows doesn't, but if you're above that level it's generally better.

    😂

    [–] Wolfwood1@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    That's my experience as well. I've been a Mint user for around 6 years (2012 to 2018 or 2019), with different DEs (Gnome, Cinnamon and Mate) and installations and there was always something that stopped working all of a sudden, or something wrong with Mint altogether that made the experience bittersweet. I even tried LMDE for a bit and didn't last a week using it.

    I ended up hopping to Antergos (RIP) and have been with it ever since.

    [–] rab@lemmy.ca -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

    Ya I'm a Linux system administrator and comments like that are beyond annoying. Linux is not user friendly lol

    Also my workstation is Windows 11, your tears fuel me

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Clearly you haven't used desktop Linux for any period of time. Its not the same as a server and is pretty nice and friendly.

    [–] rab@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

    I don't have patience for issues on my workstation, I run fedora on my personal laptop

    I get why everyone hates windows but it literally just works

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago

    I guess I've had the opposite experience. Maybe its just that I know how to fix Linux but not windows.

    [–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

    Windows has more minor problems that are superficial and easy to fix, Linux has less problems but when it does they're more significant and detrimental.

    [–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

    Yeah I'm a Linux and Windows sysadmin for almost 15 years and don't really care what it is in practice, just disagree with Microsoft on many things. People have actually argued to me here why I shouldn't use Windows Server in an enterprise setting, as if a sysadmin who doesn't prefer Windows would have any bearing on such things. It's also funny how people seem to think managing Windows is very different than managing Linux, you're basically doing the same things, I really only interact with Windows in the same manner I interact with Linux it's just remote powershell instead of ssh. Building Windows server is just running a powershell script, building Linux server is just running the playbook.

    Also I disable mostly everything through group policy on Windows and remove all the dumb stuff with remove-appxpackage. Use both for workstations too.

    load more comments (19 replies)