this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
431 points (99.5% liked)

News

23311 readers
3407 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Birdie@thelemmy.club 91 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Texas judge grants permission for woman to access healthcare.

That's what really happened.

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I think it's more specific to specify what that healthcare actually is.

[–] IanSomnia@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes, being specific is more specific. I assume you're implying that more specific = better. The point of the comenter you replied to is that the specifics of the type of healthcare they are receiving is unnecessary. You shouldn't need a judge to give your doctor permission to provide you with healthcare. It doesn't matter what kind it is.

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

the specifics of the type of healthcare they are receiving is unnecessary.

To you, maybe. But you don't get to deem what's necessary for everyone else.

You're arguing in bad faith when you try to hide your stance behind vagueness. Both sides do it, and I never take either of you seriously when you do.

[–] IanSomnia@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Hide our stance? The original commenter summarized the article in a way that made their stance clear. They believe the procedure in the article is medical care. They don't have to state what procedure they're talking about because it's in the article.

Your accusation that they're trying to hide what the procedure is leads me to believe you don't agree that it is healthcare. So in the interest of having a productive discussion about the topic of this article I will make an argument and ask you what you think.

  1. What is considered healthcare should be decided by medical professional consensus.

  2. Your access to healthcare should not be dependent on a judges approval.

  3. The procedure we are discussing detailed in the article is considered healthcare by medical professional consensus.

Conclusion. Access to the procedure we are discussing detailed in the article should not be dependent on a judges approval.

What do you think?

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago

I think you assumed an argument that is not mine and then proceeded to argue against it as though you were arguing against me.

I was very clear from the beginning, and my position has not changed nor have you invalidated it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)