this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
156 points (97.6% liked)

World News

39104 readers
2217 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Russia is depleting their Soviet inheritance rapidly in Ukraine. There is visual confirmation of over 13,000 Russian vehicles lost in Ukraine, including over 2,500 Russian tanks lost. They are unable able to replace this level of loss.

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Unfortunately Russia has a long history of throwing bodies at a problem until it is solved. They lost almost 30 million people in WWII and I have no doubt Putin would throw as many as he could get away with at Ukraine as was needed.

[–] Darukhnarn@feddit.de 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A lot of these bodies were Ukrainian back then.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He can solve it by withdrawing his forces.

[–] Slotos@feddit.nl 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He’s achieving two of his goals: genocide of Ukrainians and genocide of minorities of Russian federation.

Why would he withdraw?

[–] ricdeh@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Genocide has no meaning anymore. The war between Ukraine and Russia is pretty much as conventional as it can get, stop using the term genocide inflationary

[–] Slotos@feddit.nl 4 points 11 months ago

Genocide has five very precise definitions that have no connection to the type of war being waged.

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

shhh common sense is too advanced for them

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I don't think he could do 30 mil. His army is only about 3 million personnel including reservists per wikipedia, and AFU is claiming to have liquidated nearly 10% that many. Military theory is that an army loses all combat efficacy at around 30-40% casualties, and the rate of Russian casualties per day has gone up very significantly. After Russia spent all those lives in WWII, their demographics are still not what they used to be.

Despite the fact that they're paying troops so much to fight, it's not clear to me that they can sustain these losses indefinitely. What we're really seeing here is whether Putin's "military Keynesianism" can overcome Russia's demographic collapse. Experts are already saying Russia could not mount an invasion of this scale again for the foreseeable future.

I think they're going to end up as a failed state in the long run whether or not they succeed in Ukraine. The resistance would metastasize into an insurgency.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They had more soldiers than guns.

Folks went into the front lines knowing the plan was to pick up guns from their dead commrades.

[–] giantofthenorth@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's important enough to note, there's no evidence showing this was the plan in any Soviet campaign in WW2. (But this is based off memory so there could be a single digit number of times)

In WW1? That would be accurate. Say what you will about Soviets but weapons were something they could produce and properly supply unlike the tsar.

In the Ukraine war though you are probably correct.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'll admit my sources are unverifiable, while strong.

Stories from college professors. Guy was not a biased man, and was probably a fuggin mod on /r/askhistory; that type. 🤷‍♂️ Strong to me. No one listen to me. I'm drunk.

Edit: and my general history is not iron clad; could been WWI, but it seems a prevalent story beyond my eccentric old professor.

[–] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 6 points 1 year ago

I loved that you got two conscripts out of your barracks instead of one when playing as Russia in Command and Conquer.