this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
1357 points (97.3% liked)

linuxmemes

21041 readers
655 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    1357
    Steve Balmer quotes (infosec.pub)
    submitted 10 months ago by 0x4E4F@infosec.pub to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    253 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world 76 points 10 months ago (20 children)

    Anyone know how I can program Anarchism?

    [–] ThePhantomGM@lemmy.world 91 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    Allow all code merges automatically

    [–] oce@jlai.lu 27 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Anarchy is not absence of rules, it's absence of hierarchy. So you could still collectively agree to certain rules for merges.

    [–] uis@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

    Basicaly democracy on steroids

    [–] aksdb@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago

    So we could use a blockchain....... (/s)

    [–] mcmoor@bookwormstory.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    But then one person disagree with those rules and we're back to no rules

    [–] oce@jlai.lu 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    You can have a majority vote system.

    [–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    Which is not a collective agreement and not anarchism, if it imposes rules on those who voted against.

    [–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    Is it not possible for the people to all agree to respect the result of the majority vote even if they voted against the motion?

    [–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    Which requires a consensus.

    [–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    An initial one.

    [–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago

    Which can be broken at any moment, and no infant is bound by it until they accept it, and they have the choice of not accepting it.

    Expecting some aliens to bring us the end of scarcity is similar to this in terms of probabilities.

    load more comments (18 replies)