this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
1063 points (100.0% liked)

196

16509 readers
2335 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 80 points 1 year ago (25 children)

Getting the vibe that OP is being serious while using a template supposed to be ironic.

Seems odd to be angry about game graphics progressing. Imagine how it was during the 90s.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 22 points 1 year ago (19 children)

And if they are serious it doesn't make sense, ray tracing, path tracing, global illumination, make a game leaps and bounds more enjoyable for me. Realistic lighting is everything, I cannot wait for the day they finally get the new global illumination system in star citizen...

[–] avater@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

i don't see the benefit of raytracing....

[–] Pixelologist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Do you have a gpu that can run max raytracing at 1440p - 100+ fps?

I'm not saying it's a worthwile investment, but if you CAN run it well... you're going to.

[–] daellat@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

What gpu can actually run 100fps with rt on 1440p?

[–] avater@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes I did, still choosed to run games without raytracing on ultra without any upscale. Of course I did notice some (imho!) minor nice lighting and refraction stuff with raytracing, but for me these never justified the performance loss and the soft look of an upscaled image.

Therefore I'd rather choose not to play with raytracing and I don't have the feeling that I miss something :)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)