this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
385 points (85.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26956 readers
3069 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Before you all get your panties in a twist, I know it's technically not true.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's historical consensus. Your quality of life is still better because you have civil rights and access to medical care that actually works.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If it's consensus then there must be sources somewhere.

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You got it the wrong way around: If it's consensus, no one questions it anymore so you don't need a source. If you start to question commonly hold beliefs, you will have to unlearn the whole field of economics. Do you want that?

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This entire quote is actually a perfect encapsulation of orthodox economics, said with absolutely no self awareness.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the system I've lived with my entire life!! How could it be anything but correct?! I'm a smart guy, I'm sure I'd have noticed if something were amiss.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

Plus look at all these high-paid people who agree with me! Surely they wouldn't be so rich if they were telling lies!

[–] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In order to reach a consensus like that, you have to have supporting evidence that it's true. Otherwise that consensus should absolutely be challenged.

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It happens in all kind of scientific fields that things that feel logical and common sense, are taken for granted. I think SciShow made a video about it but I can't find it right now.

[–] EatYouWell@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're talking about anthropology/history here. People spend their entire careers researching things like this and publishing papers on it.

To make a claim like this requires evidence. Historical records would exist that some person at some point gathered together and published a peer reviewed article on.

If no sources or peer reviewed articles exist on the topic other than a few blog posts, then it's extremely likely it's a pile of horse shit.

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think you got my point at all. My point is that even natural science, which is "hard science" and much easier falsifiable, this also happens. I found the video if you're interested (It's by Be Smart, I was wrong about the channel).

There is also a video about the history of work that is more on topic. If you don't want to watch the video, you can just read the sources in the description.

But talking about anthropologists: here is a quote from David Graeber's book Bullshit Jobs:

Feudal lords, insofar as they worked at all, were fighters—their lives tended to alternate between dramatic feats of arms and near-total idleness and torpor. Peasants and servants obviously were expected to work more steadily. But even so, their work schedule was nothing remotely as regular or disciplined as the current nine-to-five—the typical medieval serf, male or female, probably worked from dawn to dusk for twenty to thirty days out of any year, but just a few hours a day otherwise, and on feast days, not at all. And feast days were not infrequent.

He is an anthropologist who devoted his whole career debunking such claims and published a book together with a historian who does the same. It's called "the dawn of everything" by David Graeber and David Wengrow (2021). You should check it out. I could look up more anthropologists to back my claim but I don't want to spend too much time for people who talk down on me (none of these are block posts, surprised?) and you are yet to come up with all the anthropologists and historians (not economics, they don't count) who support your claim.

[–] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Thank you for finding a source.

I didn't make any claim one way or another, I was just saying that any consensus in academia is going to be backed up by some sort of research and evidence.

And anything you inferred as talking down to you was a misinterpretation on your part.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

I found the video if you're interested (It's by Be Smart, I was wrong about the channel)

There is also a video about the history of work that is more on topic

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Economics is less accurate than astrology because at least if you are an astrologist who gets things wrong you stop getting paid. Sure it is cold reading and Barnum statements but it is still more accurate.

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do you also ask for sources when people contend that Julius Caesar was a real person, or that the world is round? Go to JSTOR and start building your case if you're so keen to display your ignorance about common knowledge, or do you need a SOURCE to tell you that JSTOR actually exists and isn't a modern fiction?

[–] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could turn down your douchebag levels quite a lot and still make a point.

It'll make you look much less like an asshole when you're wrong, which you are.

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't be belligerent and you won't get the door slammed on you, being upset about tone of a message to the point of it overriding your ability to accept its content is overly emotional and extremely childish.

wrong, which you are

UHHH SOURCE?!?! SOURCE????????

[–] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I'm not the person asking for a source, but good job proving that you're an asshole.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

We have coins with his face on it.

[–] yiliu@informis.land 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not historical consensus. It's a claim made by some historians that went viral online.

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It seems very emotionally important to you that you believe that. Best of luck.

[–] yiliu@informis.land 0 points 1 year ago