this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
528 points (99.8% liked)

196

16593 readers
2470 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 61 points 1 year ago (10 children)

There actually is no paradox if you think of this way:

Be tolerant of ideas that harm nobody.

Be intolerant of ideas that harm others.

"I'm gay." <- Tolerable.

"I'm not gay, so I won't date men." <- Tolerable.

"I'm not gay, so I think we should kill all gay people." <- Intolerable.

[–] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem with this is that people disagree about what harms others. Right wing insane people are not living in the same reality that you and I are. They genuinely believe that even seeing a gay person is harmful. They genuinely believe that the existence of gay people is harmful to others.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well no, there are objective harms and subjective harms.

If I slap you that's an objective harm.

If I'm gay and that's objectional to you, that's a subjective harm to some people.

Essentially physical acts v emotional harms.

[–] fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some people may see all morales as God given and therefore absolute

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Perhaps absolute but still not objective. I can prove things that are objective with repetition, subjective things not so much.

load more comments (8 replies)