this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
-11 points (26.1% liked)

Emacs

2194 readers
1 users here now

Our infinitely powerful editor.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
-11
Is GNU Emacs still worth it? (lemmy.opensupply.space)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by nyl@lemmy.opensupply.space to c/emacs@lemmy.ml
 

Seems like with all AI-enabling and just works out of the box experiences with VSCode and alike, makes GNU Emacs absolete. I'm aware of AI packages for GNU Emacs, but don't think is worth the investiement so much; I would mostly save it for org mode, TUI, and some other few packages. But for programming, it doesn't seem lile worth the investment, and use VSCode instead.


Certainly knowing things will always be valuable - but the effect of assistants and LLMs may be to change what it is valuable to know by devaluing a great heap of current generation’s programmers’s stock and trade.

As an addenda: by value in the above I mean “instrumental value” or more specifically, valuable to the rich who want to exploit the skills of others to become yet richer. There is always intrinsic value to knowing for the people who love to know.


fomosapien@emacs.ch, https://emacs.ch/users/fomosapien/statuses/111264462444461233

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nyl@lemmy.opensupply.space -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Why so? Do you work with lisp languages? I've been recently fiding learning [e]lisp a con since it's basically a domain specific language. Only Clojure has a bit of commercial opportunities, but even then it's better to learn JavaScript/TypeScript for its greater use cases. Also, if I wanted to play with functional programming I'd go Haskell, Lean, or even Shen.

[–] Dizbdeedee@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

it's a domain specific language

Yeah, but it's very configurable and has some extensions that have really changed how I work in an editor, that I can completely change the internals for on the fly, which is not a priority for vscode

I have no strong attachment to lisp and I agree having to learn it is a con and a time sink, but I've done some small extension development for vscode and hated it

Nevermind that you already know the language when it's behind layers of api cruft and a seperate compiler, then the debugger gives you minifed javascript bleh

Commercial arguments are a thing, but a bit reductive no? How would vscode extension development help you earn a job that grinding leetcode or that specific role would be better suited for

[–] nyl@lemmy.opensupply.space 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I’ve done some small extension development for vscode and hated it

I respect your argument

Commercial arguments are a thing, but a bit reductive no?

I meant you're putting into practice a language/tech that has real and great demand than one that has little to none outside the specific domain of a text editor. Not that it automatically lands you money

[–] hajovonta@mastodon.online 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@nyl
Just use whatever works for you man, no need to advocate your preferences

I'm happy that you found your new home, let's close this!
@Dizbdeedee

[–] nyl@lemmy.opensupply.space 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Lol don't take me wrong, I'm still using Emacs alongside other editors. Case closed then.

[–] hajovonta@mastodon.online 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@nyl yeah I'm not against meaningful comparisons but this started turning into a flamewar which I had more than enough in the past years. ;)

peace

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)