this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
0 points (50.0% liked)

Main

139 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] QuieroLaSeptima@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (5 children)

It’s all so disgraceful. It was already essentially a lock, but this just confirms it a bit more. Indonesia isn’t in a position to host, but that’s not the point.

I don’t get how FIFA is going to allow this bid. FIFA had this rule to be able to host a bid: “hosts are required to have at least fourteen all-seater stadiums with a capacity of 40,000, with a minimum of seven being pre-existing.”

Saudi Arabia has 2 such pre-existing stadiums. They didn’t meet the requirement (the South American bid did). But of course FIFA suddenly decided to relax that rule for Saudi.

Imo, it would’ve been much more ethical for the South American countries to renovate a few existing stadiums that will continue to be used after the World Cup rather than allow/encourage Saudi to spend billions to build 10+ brand fucking new stadiums that will mostly sit empty after the cup.

Fuck FIFA and Saudi (and CONMEBOL for being fine with this shit).

[–] Weary_Logic@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

You’re basing your opinion on the assumption South American countries can renovate their stadiums.

South America is broke. They can either print more money and cause more inflation (not good) or find someone willing to loan them (not likely since most of them are already drowning in IMF loans).

There is a reason South America let Spain have 2030 without a fight. Unless their economy gets better they know FIFA won’t let them hold a WC.

load more comments (4 replies)