this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
37 points (95.1% liked)

Games

16407 readers
1500 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

and still no official multiplayer

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] PooPooTheClown@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No lol and I don’t think many people are putting that as prio on their feature wish list. It’s already a resource intensive game, and there is a lot of room for improvement, as they’ve been showing off with these vids lately.

And multiplayer sounds gimmicky anyway

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I hadn't thought about it, as the only experience with "multiplayer" I've ever had in city management games was with Simcity 2013 which... ahem. We can do without. However a factorio-like experience where multiple friends can work together on the same city does sound fun.

But yeah given how resource-intensive even the first C:S still is in big cities, I don't see that happening as a seamless experience would almost certainly require a complete re-architecture of the simulation engine, nevermind the fact that more people implies bigger cities implies more resources that must be dedicated to simulation (nevermind the netcode overhead, which might not be negligible with tens of thousands of entities to keep track of).

They already greatly increased map size in this version, which concerns me with performance as my previous build already slowed down simulation speed significantly in mid-sized cities, especially with traffic mods. Presumably they've added some architectural changes to better parallelize the simulation on many-core CPUs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)