this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
269 points (96.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

12369 readers
1456 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I know it's common in my city, Sydney, for apartment complexes to build enough car spaces for the occupants. Part of the issue is that of they didn't have that requirement, none would be built, I steady putting extra pressure on street parking and public parking facilities. Residents of those complexes also have no entitlement to a parking permit, which older houses without spots do have.

Nowadays, in inner city with less car need, the spaces required is reduced, with some spots reserved for car share schemes instead.

So, like everything, blanket rules aren't great but rules are needed for a reason.

[–] Muaddib@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Part of the issue is that of they didn't have that requirement, none would be built

Good. Ban car parking.

putting extra pressure on street parking and public parking facilities

Don't build those either. Put the money that would have been spent on parking spaces into towtrucks.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As a non car owner, I'd love to agree. Banning car spots and cars is not yet feasible for most people. So, not having those spots available would make those kind of developments harmful for the rest of the community, further marginalizing them.

What is more likely to work is to make the regulation more flexible. So community cars count as 2 or 3 private cars. Then the complex needs less spaces.

[–] Muaddib@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Banning car spots and cars is not yet feasible for most people

Necessity is the mother of invention. "Destroy it and they will leave."

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We could be like Japan where in order to own a car, you have to prove you have somewhere private to park it instead of just putting it on the street.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Which is the point of the requirement we're talking about, lol!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)