this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
96 points (99.0% liked)

World News

36372 readers
407 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Israel has placed two international activists from a Gaza-bound aid ship in solitary confinement, an Israeli rights group said on Wednesday.

“Rima Hassan was placed in isolation under inhumane conditions in Neve Tirza Prison after writing “Free Palestine” on a wall in Givon Prison,” it added.

“She was moved to a small, windowless cell with extremely poor hygienic conditions and has been denied access to the prison yard.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Interesting source. It’s basically a nationalized Turkish outlet:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anadolu_Agency

After the Justice and Development Party (AKP) took power, AA and the Turkish Radio and Television Corporation (TRT) were both restructured to more closely reflect the administration line. According to a 2016 academic article, "these public news producers, especially during the most recent term of the AKP government, have been controlled by officials from a small network close to the party leadership."

Still, the writing is flat in a good way? I have found that reporting from politically captured sources (say, RT) can be conspicuously good, if it’s on an international subject that aligns with their incentives. For instance, Turkey's AKP is no fan of Netanyahu, hence AA is motivated to produce (seemingly) original reporting like this.

[–] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Could you give us an example of a source that isn't "politically captured"?

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not really, heh.

There are different degrees though, and different environments for each one, which is what I meant to convey. Like, AA is a better source for Gaza information than, say, Turkish political opposition parties.

[–] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Well, I was expecting you to say Reuters, allowing me to rip into them + AP + AFP. Was not expecting someone to say that the PKK is an unreliable source of information. Who sent you? That's supposed to be one of my takes!

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

You misinterpreted my, to be fair, vague statement. I meant AA is seemingly a bad source to read about opposition parties like the PKK, because of the obvious conflict of interest.

I mean, AP is a pretty decent source. It’s a nonprofit coop stretching back to 1846 in a country with, err, could-be-worse press freedom history, while AA has been explicitly state run since 1920, somewhat akin to VOA, BBC, Al Jazeera or RT I guess.

And yes, I know, AP is still an objectively bad source for specific topics, you don’t have to drill that in. So would whoever shills for the PKK, in some respects. But I’m not playing the game of “they did this and this, they can’t be trusted like them and them!” either. One has to look for conflict of interests everywhere, but it’s also okay to respect the good work long running institutions have done (like AA and this article).

load more comments (2 replies)