When an oil refinery blows up and gasoline prices are suddenly 8x what they are now are you going to be saying "OMG why did they do this without any kind of warning"?

Consider the possibility that blocking traffic, throwing paint on paintings and yachts, the orange dust, etc. might be a warning. If your commute is being blocked, use that time to think about what your plan will be when you can no longer afford to put gasoline in your car. Put emotion aside and think about how you would logically solve that problem. Because you might have to soon enough.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If your commute is being blocked, use that time to think

I use that time to think about bills classifying intentional obstruction of traffic to be unlawful detention.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So you've chosen your side in this. No one needs to feel bad about the problems it'll cause for you if and when it comes time to start blowing up refineries.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Correct. The problems of a blown up refinery will affect the oil producers first. The problems of obstructing traffic will affect the oil producers never.

Picket the oil infrastructure. Make it expensive and unreliable, and consumers will gravitate away from it. The problems it will cause are not a big, but a feature.

[–] snowbell@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It could be said that blocking traffic benefits oil producers by increasing gasoline usage and making people less sympathetic to the cause against them. Wasn't there a case of someone in the oil industry paying people to protest in a similarly asinine way?