this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
121 points (91.7% liked)

Programming

17460 readers
139 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Learner here. I don't like nesting single use functions. The moment I follow a function and it's just another abstraction for more functions I start feeling dread. Also I can't help but feel bad for cluttering the name space by breaking out single use functions in general, even if they're private. Seeing the sentiment here, guess I gotta get used to it

[–] falsem@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I don’t like nesting single use functions.

At a certain point this is necessary due to overall length. You don't want a single function that is hundreds of lines long - they suck to debug and to test. Single-use functions break that up into logical chunks that make it easier to understand.

The moment I follow a function and it’s just another abstraction for more functions I start feeling dread.

This can actually be ideal in many cases due to the Single-responsibility Principle. Think of the purpose of those functions as coordinating the workflow of the other functions.

load more comments (1 replies)