Not The Onion

15130 readers

2696 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

796

Tesla Fans Furious at Video of Tesla Crashing Into Wall Painted Like Road (futurism.com)

submitted 14 hours ago by whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

144 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In the piece — titled "Can You Fool a Self Driving Car?" — Rober found that a Tesla car on Autopilot was fooled by a Wile E. Coyote-style wall painted to look like the road ahead of it, with the electric vehicle plowing right through it instead of stopping.

The footage was damning enough, with slow-motion clips showing the car not only crashing through the styrofoam wall but also a mannequin of a child. The Tesla was also fooled by simulated rain and fog.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 87 points 11 hours ago (25 children)

Why would a car that expensive not have a LiDAR sensor?

[–] FrChazzz@lemm.ee 24 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (16 children)

Read about this somewhere. Iirc, Elon felt cameras were better than LiDAR at a time when that was kinda true, but the technology improved considerably in the interim and he pridefully refuses to admit he needs to adapt. [Edit: I had hastily read the referenced article and am incorrect here; link to accurate statements is linked in a reply below.]

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 42 points 10 hours ago (5 children)

I don't even understand that logic. Use both. Even if one is significantly better than the other, they each have different weaknesses and can mitigate for each other.

[–] NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml 31 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

It was always just to save money and pad the profit margins

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

And to make him think he's a smart boy.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 7 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

A LiDAR sensor couldn't add more than a few hundred to a car, surely

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 58 minutes ago

They ditched radar at a time when radar only added probably about $50 a car according to some estimates.

It may technically get a smidge more profitable, but it almost seems like it's more about hubris around tech shouldn't need more than a human to do as well. Which even if it were true, is a stupid stance to take when in that scenario you could have better than human senses.

[–] Deckname@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 hours ago

And thats a few hundred less profit, so we cant have that.

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (12 replies)

load more comments (20 replies)