this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
23 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

34138 readers
492 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It would be nice if I could get SMS 2FA-type notifcations on my desktop without having to use my phone.

I probably wouldn't use Signal with it, since Beeper's own page seems to suggest that sending Signal messages with it would be less secure! And, I guess, SMS isn't secure to begin with . . .

If I download and install Element, and then look at the SMS bridges available on Matrix's website, the recommended bridge instructions sends me over to Beeper, since I don't have my own server. Old and confused here . . .

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (7 children)

There's also GSconnect, a gnome implementation. There's also Zorin Connect from Zorin OS.

There is also scrcpy

https://github.com/Genymobile/scrcpy

Scrcpy literally copies the screen of your android device into a Window on your desktop

Anyway, I found those by searching "kde connect alternatives."

[–] zdhzm2pgp@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

I'll take a look at those, thank you. Using one of these is preferable to going the Matrix/Element bridge route, you think? I really like the idea of Matrix, but it was a real pain to get everyone on Signal, and bridging that to Matrix/Element seems kind of complicated and quite possibly less secure (although Signal has its own issues of course) than just using Signal by itself.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (4 children)

Beeper has questionable ownership now, and honestly, I always found their privacy practices questionable at best.

When I was being onboarded for Beeper, when it was still in it's infancy and they had to walk you through the technical setup via an onboarding video call, I asked what promises they could keep about privacy if the company was sold? I asked because the owner of Beeper was the guy who made the Pebble watch and he sold Pebble and I was wondering if the sale would require the privacy policy to stay the same. I never got a response, and then Migicovsky sold it, like I thought he might.

What actually made me ask the question initially was getting into a recorded onboarding session that I had never been warned would be recorded. The first warning I had that they would record the video-call onboarding session was when I logged into the session. They never thought to warn me ahead of time that my voice and onboarding would be recorded. I bowed out and never signed up for Beeper, especially since they never thought it was worth it to answer my questions about privacy practices after having already disrespected my privacy once. It left me with a bad taste in my mouth about their privacy promises if they couldn't even bother to warn me ahead of time that an onboarding session would be recorded.

If you were running your own Matrix server and bridge, you at least know what's happening because you're fully in control of it. But that can be a lot of work where these options are out of the box working at least.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 3 points 4 hours ago

Wise concern. I never tried Beeper, either, despite becoming eligible from the waitlist.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)