Science

3467 readers

57 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Sal@mander.xyz

fossilesque@mander.xyz

105

Fake papers are contaminating the world’s scientific literature, fueling a corrupt industry and slowing legitimate lifesaving medical research. (theconversation.com)

submitted 4 days ago by Cat@ponder.cat to c/science@mander.xyz

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (6 children)

I really think that a federated system for scientific publication could sense. Each "journal" is a separate instance, federated with all others. A department, a school, a research institute, whatever could host it. You manage submission, editing, peer review, etc. through the system.

[–] Cat@ponder.cat 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What do you mean exactly by federated in this context?

What is getting federated in your ideal scenario?

[–] Highstronaught@feddit.uk 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I think what they mean is every journal behaves like an instance on lemmy, federated with eachother. One journal not living up to your standards, block them on your instance etc. Like lemmy

[–] Cat@ponder.cat 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

What does "instance" in this case refer to?

Does he mean something along the lines of advanced search filter/engine? because it can be done now, using the usual tools.

There is no way that I could think about his comment and make sense of it.

[–] Highstronaught@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago

Each journal hosts its own papers, but can also provide access to every other paper from journals they work with.

[–] Belgdore@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

So, Lemmy is comprised of several instances of itself that can all be accessed by each other so long as they are “federated” with one another. This is designed to keep the power to censor or push an agenda out of the hands of any one person (like what’s going on with Reddit, twitter/x, and meta).

Lots of people on here see a similar set up as a panacea for the problems in all kinds of information distribution. That’s why the person you’ve been talking to is proposing the idea for scientific publishing.

I don’t think it would solve any issues of veracity. The current system allows for various publications to be seen as more or less accurate/ rigorous.

The real problem with academic publishing is the expense and IP laws that are an issue for other fields as well.

[–] Cat@ponder.cat 0 points 4 days ago

You can already follow the journals you want via RSS.

load more comments (4 replies)