this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
18 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5450 readers
551 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
18
Why more frequent cold blasts could be coming from global warming (apnews.com)
submitted 1 day ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I swear to Christ, if I hear another dipshit conservative scoff at the cold and say "Where's our gLoBaL wArMiNg?!" I'm going to lose my shit.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I usually send them this

[–] fishabel@discuss.online 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is far too advanced for them.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It's within the range where a lot of people understand it. The goal when interacting with a straight-up denier is not usually to convince them — it's to give space for the people watching the conversation to reject them.

[–] fishabel@discuss.online 2 points 21 hours ago

I’m not sure there are many people left “on the fence” though

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)