this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
1240 points (98.4% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

3460 readers
132 users here now

Rules:

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Doctors told her she would be unlikely to carry the child to term, and doing so increased her chances of infection or other severe outcome.

When the law is a witch hunt not based on science, doctors cannot operate based on their best judgement based on science. Real issues of "unlikely" and "increased her chances" aren't the same things as immediate medical emergency: they prevent an immediate medical emergency. Any law restricting abortions to when they are "medically necessary" will always lead to cases where its denied until its immediately medically necessary, at which point it may be too late. This is a clear-cut example of what such laws will always do and doctors being forced to tiptoe around the feelings of fanatics instead of being able to practice medicine.