this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
188 points (78.5% liked)

Technology

59415 readers
3295 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 12 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Let me get this straight:

  1. Person A makes a social network
  2. People flock to it
  3. Person A sells the social network to person B
  4. Networks does a 180, destroying communitie; people outraged.
  5. Same person A makes a social network
  6. People flock to it.
  7. [surely we can predict what is going to happen here, right?]
[โ€“] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 8 points 20 hours ago

This doesn't really change your point at all, but I remember reading the tech news surrounding the Twitter sale to Musk as it was happening. If memory serves, Musk literally made the $420/share purchase offer as a joke, a joke that several lawsuits were filed to decide it was a serious and legally binding offer.

He memed his way into owning Twitter against his will, and then burned down everything to assuage his ego. But because he's a goddamn billionaire there are literally no repercussions.