this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
557 points (99.5% liked)

196

16509 readers
2325 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 120 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Oh

Oh dear

We're fucked, aren't we?

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 94 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Hopefully people remember and learn from the Australian government who allowed water to be traded like stocks. The idea was that farmers and companies that needed water most would pay for water rights from people who didn't need it.

In practice it lead to mega rich foreigners buying up all the water rights in Australia and preventing anyone from using them which created artificial scarcity and drove up prices. These mega rich foreigners then sold Australians their own water back to them at exorbitant prices.

I do not support it. However the thrust of the article was to invest in water treatment and water conservation tech companies essentially.

But yeah. Water, food housing and healthcare should all be free.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)