this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
256 points (94.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7198 readers
219 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Democratic Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib defeated her Republican opponent in Michigan's 12th congressional district election on Tuesday, securing a fourth term as the only Palestinian-American woman in the US Congress.

The Associated Press called the race with just 18 percent of the votes counted.

Tlaib secured 77 percent of the vote, defeating the Republican Party's James Hooper who received just 19 percent of the vote.

Her victory comes amid the backdrop of Israel's war on Gaza, which has killed more than 43,000 Palestinians so far and has been diplomatically and militarily supported by the Biden-Harris administration for more than a year.

Tlaib has been a vocal critic of the war, calling for the US to withhold weapons from Israel. Her opposition to the war on Gaza and support for pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses have drawn harsh criticism from both Republicans and Democrats.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 20 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Short of putting boots on the ground or dropping a nuke there is no way to "fuck over Gaza even more."

[–] the_sisko@startrek.website 15 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The one thing I've learned from experience w/ Donald Trump is that he finds a way to make things worse.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

That's a very broad statement that I can't argue with because I have no intention to defend Donald Trump. Wiith that in mind I imagine anything he does to Gaza is just in line with what Biden or Harris would have also done but probably dumber. They had over a year to make us believe otherwise.

[–] the_sisko@startrek.website -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So then the logic here is "vote for a candidate who is at least as bad for Gaza, but will also fuck up the rest of the world". Or "don't vote for the candidate who will be obviously less damaging for the rest of the world, even though my action won't help Gaza at all".

Even if you assume Harris would have been just as bad for Gaza... I mean it's patently clear that the only choice is to vote for the lesser of two evils and then raise hell that you need better policies from them.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Voting for a lesser evil is still being complicit in some degree of evil.

load more comments (2 replies)