this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
126 points (93.8% liked)

Final Fantasy

1085 readers
5 users here now

A place to discuss all things Final Fantasy.

Praise be to Yevon

RULES

  1. Be civil and respectful.
  2. Mark all spoilers.
  3. No spam or low-effort posts.
  4. No NSFW content.
  5. Keep it Final Fantasy related.

[Rules in Full]

Game Flares

Related Communities

c/FinalFantasy Elsewhere

Official

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I know it's slow around here, but zero-effort AI slop can only make this community worse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ampersarnie@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (20 children)

We hear you, and are currently considering what to do - whether to introduce amended rules, what they would be and when. Current content doesn’t break any of the rules we’ve put in place, and as we’ve only had two AI related posts in the history of this community we’re not moving to immediate bans on this content. There’s an understandable dislike for AI imagery, so in the meantime we encourage members to use post votes and create your own content contributions.

[–] Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 weeks ago (14 children)

It would be a shame to blanket ban posts with generative content because of two low quality posts. A mod took over a community and just banned AI posts for no reason. That made me pretty sad.

[–] november@lemmy.vg 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It would be a shame to blanket ban posts with generative content

No it wouldn't.

A mod took over a community and just banned AI posts for no reason.

AI slop is garbage. That's a good enough reason.

[–] Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

AI posts had been explicitly allowed in the past, and there had been several well-liked posts in the community. Not a single person broke the old rules, which were very sensible, so a blanket ban without consulting the community was not good moderation IMO.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)