this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
27 points (88.6% liked)

Technology

34906 readers
478 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

With forced telemetry. Good thing, i am hooked on emacs and have no desire to switch.

[–] Zangoose@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Smh, it's spelt vim by the way

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I am actually a user of Evil, which provides vim keybindings in Emacs. I switched from vim to Emacs, because I wanted to use org-mode, but I prefer vim keybindings.

[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

All I want is a performant and modern Emacs that has the same speed and startup time as neovim while not requiring the daemon, which also has the stability and capabilities of neovim (things like super easy language integration and lsp are a godsend)

[–] crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago

Tweaking the init file goes a long way in speeding up Emacs init, you can change the GC threshold during initialisation, as well as only load a minimum amount of packages

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)