this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
1370 points (99.0% liked)

RetroGaming

19568 readers
549 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Yep but not if you write sloppy C code. Gotta keep those nuts and bolts tight!

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (5 children)

If you're writing sloppy C code your assembly code probably won't work either

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Except everyone writing C is writing sloppy C. It's like driving a car, there's always a non-zero chance of an accident.

Even worse, in C the compiler is just waiting for you to trip up so it can do something weird. Think the risk of UB is overblown? I found this article from Raymond Chen enlightening: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20140627-00/?p=633

[–] UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

I hope you are not argueing that using assembly is an improvement over using C in that regard....

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)